Paul Lashmar : News

Kind of Coltrane Concert Friday 22 June 2012

paul.lashmar1@nospam.com (Paul) — Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:13:26 +0000

Bridport Arts Centre

Kind of Brubeck Concert 20 May 2011

paul.lashmar1@nospam.com (Paul) — Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:37:35 +0000

‘Kind of Brubeck’   with Darius Brubeck, Frank Griffith, Matt Ridley and Wesley Gibbens. ‘

Kind of Brubeck’ will include Dave Brubeck’s greatest hits, Take Five, Blue Rondo a la Turk and Unsquare Dance as well as music from Dave’s son, Darius who recently celebrated his father’s 90^th year by touring with his brothers and Dave O’Higgins as “Brubecks Play Brubeck”.

Dave Brubeck’s 1959 album ‘Time Out’ is one of the great jazz albums of all time and the track ‘Take Five’ with its distinctive 5/4 time signature is still known and played the world over. This two set music event has as Darius on piano and Frank on sax and clarinet, it will include Matt Ridley on bass and Wesley Gibbens on drums. Matt and Wes recently toured Romania and Saudi Arabia with Darius and Frank and Matt have also played together in London. The musicians together provide a fresh and exiting rendering of old and new tunes.

Bridport Arts Centre
Friday 20th May
Doors open at 7.30pm
Tickets (seated) £12(supporters £11, concessions £8)
Box Office 01308 424204
www.bridport-arts.co.uk

This concert carries on from last year’s successful ‘Inside Kind of Blue’ event at the Bridport Arts Centre that featured the music of Miles Davis.

This event is brought to you by Paul Lashmar and Frank Griffith.

“Following the fantastic response we’ve had to previous jazz events in Bridport we’re able to bring another world class jazz evening. It’s a unique town with special audience and we’re really looking forward to this unique concert,” says Paul Lashmar.

A Brunel University Jazz Outreach Project

Wikileaks – a Watergate moment?

paul.lashmar1@nospam.com (Paul) — Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:16:17 +0000

Posted on 12/03/2011

Jstewart from Univ of Glamorgan has produced an excellent summary blog of the conference I spoke at on Wednesday.

Here’s an edited selection: “Are we witnessing a rebirth of investigative journalism, thanks to an armoury of new (web-based) weapons? Is the Wikileaks phenomenon the equivalent, for young journalists, of the Watergate investigation which inspired a previous generation (including the writer of this blog)?

‘Learn to hold a sword before you put on the armour of an investigative journalist’, that was the advice from the former editor of the Sunday Times, Harold Evans, in an interview recorded for a conference this week. His recommendation, to ‘become a reporter first’, represented one side of the discussion at Coventry University, about whether investigative journalism was dead or alive.

The Guardian’s David Leigh, who’s been at the heart of the reporting of the Wikileaks cables, joined the conference via Skype and emphasised the critical contribution of the journalist. ‘Dumping raw and random documents on the web does not change the world. What makes a difference is analysing them and making sense of them.’Making sense of the vast amounts of data now being dumped on the public (by the British government among others), certainly requires new skills and tools.

Paul Lashmar described a range of web-based resources, including Cablesearch which facilitates searching of the Wikileaks cables and Datatracker which makes it possible ‘for investigators to find resources, share information, and learn new “tricks of the trade”.’ He believes Wikileaks has given new energy to investigative journalism. Challenged on whether this really was investigative journalism, he replied: ‘It’s information we can do something with.’To read the blog click here

MA in Campaigning and Journalism (MACJ)

paul.lashmar1@nospam.com (Paul) — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:54:44 +0000

We're launching a new, unique and innovative Master course at Brunel:

MA in Campaigning and Journalism (MACJ)

If you want to campaign for a better world Brunel’s unique new MA provides you with the necessary skills. Whether it’s about human rights, the environment, climate change, people trafficking, bribery, illegal resource exploitation or a wide range of other important issues, effective campaigners use the media to challenge the excesses of the corrupt and powerful.

Campaigners like Greenpeace, Amnesty International, Global Witness, Human Rights Watch and many others were once run by enthusiastic amateurs, but are rapidly becoming highly professionalised. Now these organisations seek highly skilled and motivated recruits to join their teams.

Within the media there’s been a long traditional of campaigning journalism with important figures such as John Pilger, Paul Foot, Heather Brooke and Marjorie Wallace and Nellie Bly. New technology has brought a new wave of campaigning journalists like Clare Sambrook whose successful and award winning campaign against child detention appeared online.

Brunel’s MA in Campaigning and Journalism offers a unique combination of cutting-edge skills including journalism, investigative techniques, campaigning, advocacy and appropriate elements of ethics and law and a good theoretical base. The course is developed out of Brunel University’s unique, successful and accredited journalism courses that emphasise employability and generate thinking journalists with high quality vocational skills.

The MACJ was developed in close consultation with senior journalists and campaigners from many pressure groups, non-governmental organisations, to charities. The syllabus provides a rigorous foundation for careers in the media and the campaigning sector.

In his endorsement for the course, Reprieve director Clive Stafford-Smith, commented: “Reprieve places a huge emphasis on investigation – important cases are won by facts to a far greater extent than they are by law. The MA in Campaigning and Journalism recognises that investigations and campaigns that were once the province of the traditional media are often now conducted by campaigning groups.” Recruiting for 2012/13

For more details click here

Blog Link - Salon interesting analysis of US reporting of Iraq War

paul.lashmar1@nospam.com (Paul) — Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:06:03 +0000

Tuesday, Jan 4, 2011 07:05 ET

John Burns' "ministering angels" and "liberators"

By It's not surprising that war journalists who feel endangered would be grateful to the U.S. military for protecting them. Indeed, that's the whole premise of the embed program: having American journalists dependent upon U.S. forces for everything -- from their safety to their sustenance -- will render them grateful and will cause them to identify not as independent journalists but as members (and dependents) of the invading force. However understandable that might be, seeing the invading American army as "ministering angels" and "my liberators, too" cannot but shape and distort one's "reporting" on the war. To read full articleGlenn Greenwald

In this week's New Yorker, Peter Maass -- who was in Iraq covering the war at the time -- examines the iconic, manufactured toppling of the Saddam statue in Baghdad's Firdos Square, an event the American media relentlessly exploited in April, 2003, to propagandize citizens into believing that Iraqis were gleeful over the U.S. invasion and that the war was a smashing success.

Acknowledging that the episode demonstrated that American troops had taken over the center of Baghdad, Maas nonetheless explains that "everything else the toppling was said to represent during repeated replays on television -- victory for America, the end of the war, joy throughout Iraq -- was a disservice to the truth."Working jointly with ProPublica on this investigation, Maass describes the hidden, indispensable role the U.S. military played in that event -- which has long been known -- though he convincingly argues that the primary culprit in this propaganda effort was the Americans media. That is who did more than anyone to wildly distort this event.

As usual, the Watchdog Press not only happily ingests and trumpets pro-government propaganda, but does so even more enthusiastically and uncritically than government spokespeople themselves.The reason there's so little government censorship of the press in America is because it's totally unnecessary; why would the government even want to censor a media this compliant and subservient? Recall the derision heaped upon the media even by Bush's own former Press Secretary, Scott McClellan, for being "too deferential" to administration propaganda.

As soon as an entity emerges that provides genuinely adversarial coverage of the U.S. Government -- such as WikiLeaks, whistleblowers, or isolated articles exposing its malfeasance -- the repressive measures come fast and furious. But in general, it's no more necessary for the U.S. Government to censor the American media than it would be for Barack Obama to try to silence Robert Gibbs.In describing the military-subservient mentality that dominated how most American establishment reporters covered the Saddam-statue incident, Maass includes these highly revealing anecdotes, including one about The New York Times' lead war correspondent, John Burns:

The media have been criticized for accepting the Bush Administration’s claims, in the run-up to the invasion, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. The W.M.D. myth, and the media’s embrace of it, encouraged public support for war. The media also failed at Firdos Square, but in this case it was the media, rather than the government, that created the victory myth.

One of the first TV reporters to broadcast from Firdos was David Chater, a correspondent for Sky News, the British satellite channel whose feed from Baghdad was carried by Fox News. (Both channels are owned by News Corp.) Before the marines arrived, Chater had believed, as many journalists did, that his life was at risk from American shells, Iraqi thugs, and looting mobs."That’s an amazing sight, isn’t it?" Chater said as the tanks rolled in. "A great relief, a great sight for all the journalists here. . . . The Americans waving to us now -- fantastic, fantastic to see they’re here at last.” Moments later, outside the Palestine, Chater smiled broadly and told one marine, “Bloody good to see you.” Noticing an American flag in another marine’s hands, Chater cheerily said, "Get that flag going!"Another correspondent, John Burns, of the Times, had similar feelings.

Representing the most prominent American publication, Burns had a particularly hard time with the security thugs who had menaced many journalists at the Palestine. His gratitude toward the marines was explicit. "They were my liberators, too," he later wrote. "They seemed like ministering angels to me."The happy relief felt by some journalists on the ground was compounded by editors and anchors back home. Primed for triumph, they were ready to latch onto a symbol of what they believed would be a joyous finale to the war.

Brunel Journalism degree achieves NCTJ accreditation

paul.lashmar1@nospam.com (Paul) — Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:04:04 +0000

Only NCTJ BA in M25 Area and Brunel's MCTJ MA is one of only two in Greater London

News: Public 'don't want Murdoch to control more of news media'

paul.lashmar1@nospam.com (Paul) — Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:41:01 +0000

By Sam Greenhill
27th December 2010

An overwhelming majority of the public is opposed to Rupert Murdoch having greater control of Britain’s news media, a survey reveals today.

In an ICM poll, 84 per cent said they were against any single organisation exerting too much influence.The media tycoon is trying to take over broadcaster BSkyB, with his company News Corporation bidding to buy the 61 per cent of shares it does not already own.

But 63 per cent of the public believes there should be an independent investigation into the purchase, the poll showed. Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt will receive an initial report from the regulator Ofcom on the implications of the planned deal by Friday.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1341760/Public-dont-want-Murdoch-control-news-media.html#ixzz19J7ZihFe

Interesting Private Eye piece on FIFA and FA and hacks...

paul.lashmar1@nospam.com (Paul) — Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:20:41 +0000

FOOTBALL FLACKWATCH

The blazers at the English FA may now reconsider plans to give a high-profile job to Simon Greenberg, former Evening Standard sports editor and Chelsea FC press supremo, following his woefully inept performance as “chief of staff” for the 2018 World Cup bidding team.

to read more

From Andrew Jennings, reporter of BBC Panorama on FIFA programme

paul.lashmar1@nospam.com (Paul) — Sun, 19 Dec 2010 08:49:00 +0000

http://www.transparencyinsport.org <http://www.transparencyinsport.org>

The BBC Panorama FIFA’s Dirty Secrets took us away for several months but we’re back, uploading Seasonal presents for our loyal supporters.

There’s the film for those who missed it, the script, more disclosures, conspiracy theories, serious academic analysis of what’s gone wrong in Sepp Blatter’s world of kickbacks, another appearance by the con artist formerly known as ‘Sniff,’ (think about it!) an invitation to download a story nasty lawyers are trying to kill . . . and some laughs.

Come back in a few days to check out an armful of documents that Herr Blatter wants suppressed, the emails that prove to anybody (except Blatter and his cowardly ‘Ethics Committee’) that Jack Warner was back in the World Cup tickets rackets this year and more evidence of how FIFA cheats fans.

Season’s Greetings and gifts for everybody at . . .

http://www.transparencyinsport.org <http://www.transparencyinsport.org>